GEARWRENCH LAUNCHES @WORK VIDEO CONTEST, ASKS TOOL USERS TO SHOW THEIR TOOLS IN ACTION

BALTIMORE (June 1 76, 2010) – GearWrench® today announced the launch of its “GearWrench @Work” contest, which allows tool users to upload a video for a chance to win an all expenses paid trip to Las Vegas in November to attend the Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association’s (SEMA) annual conference. The GearWrench @Work contest kicks off today and will run through Friday, August 13.

“Whether you are a mechanic in an industrial plant, automotive technician, aviation mechanic or expert weekend warrior, this contest provides you with the chance to show us how you put GearWrench tools to the test,” said Kenneth Escoe, vice president of marketing for GearWrench.

GearWrench @ Work Contest Rules and Guidelines:

  • Upload an up to five-minute video to www.gearwrench.com before August 13, 2010 showing your most extreme work environment, a tough challenge in the shop or how you tackle a difficult task using your favorite GearWrench tool
  • A panel of judges will select 10 finalists whose videos will be posted online on August 25, 2010
  • Voting will take place at www.gearwrench.com between August 25 and September 29, 2010 by GearWrench enthusiasts
  • The Grand Prize winner will join the GearWrench team in Las Vegas for the Specialty Equipment Manufacturers Association’s (SEMA) annual conference November 2-5, 2010. SEMA is the premier industry event where thousands gather every year to see what’s next in the automotive aftermarket and heavy duty tool and equipment world. The winner also will have an opportunity to meet drivers from the Bimmerworld/GearWrench race team and talk to the pros about GearWrench tools
  • The remaining nine finalists each will receive a GearWrench prize package

Videos may be no larger than 1GB and no more than five minutes in length. GearWrench recommends the MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 format at 640×360 or 480×360 resolution.

The contest is open to legal residents of the 50 United States and District of Columbia (“D.C.”) who are 18 years of age or older at time of entry. For complete details about the “GearWrench @Work” contest, visit www.gearwrench.com/contest.

The Ways of Japan: Scraping the Ways of Japanese Culture

By Noah Graff

Today’s Machining World Archives April 2009 Volume 5 Issue 04

February 16-28, 2009, I traveled to Japan; with business class plane fare and three days of accommodations and activities generously paid for by Japanese machine tool builder, Mitsui Seiki. I was part of a group of 15 people, comprised of the company’s sales managers, salesmen, distributors, prospective customers and one other journalist from Aerospace Manufacturing and Design. Scott Walker, President of the American division for Mitsui Seiki and organizer of the trip, explained to me that the purpose of the trip was to foster relationships between the company’s brass and prospective customers, which would hopefully lead to selling some machines. It made sense—do some fun activities, bond, network—but I still didn’t fully understand the overall significance of bringing everyone across the globe until after the company’s program ended and I traveled around the country on my own for a week.

At 5:00 a.m. on the first morning, Scott took us to Tokyo’s Tsukiji fish market. It’s the world’s largest fish market and a beautiful, raw demonstration of capitalism, where giant fish are auctioned off for the equivalent of tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. It’s not a tourist attraction— and if you don’t watch your back the fish vendors can run you over with their motorized carts. We walked it, smelled it, photographed it (we weren’t supposed to), and breakfasted at one of Scott’s favorite ramen noodle stands.

A few hours later the group was bused out of Tokyo to Mitsui Seiki’s headquarters where we received a tour of the facility and a presentation from Scott demonstrating the extreme accuracy of Mitsui Seiki machines and the company’s distinct business model. He emphasized that what sets Mitsui Seiki apart from other machine tool builders is that every one of its machines is made to fit the customer’s specs—every component is produced in-house and the ways are all hand scraped. The company only produces 25 machines per month, lately focusing on 5-axis horizontal and vertical machining centers. Its main market is aerospace, which utilizes the machines’ capability to reach an accuracy of 20 microns.

As I expected, the plant was quite clean. The tables were laid out in a way that clearly pointed to the impressive precision of the ways. I’ve had tours at some impressive machine tool builder plants before—Haas in California, ZPS in Czech Republic, to name a few, but it took my 11 days in the country to understand how Mitsui Seiki builds its machines and runs its company in its own “Japanese way.” What first comes to mind is a parallel between Mitsui Seiki machines and Japanese cuisine. I see a Mitsui Seiki machine like a piece of sashimi sushi. Sushi, as with most Japanese food, is delicately prepared, and presented with the utmost of care. The knives used to prepare sushi are as sharp as possible so each piece of fish can be sliced with the greatest precision possible. The quality of the fish is also essential—if the fish isn’t truly fresh it has an inferior taste. Sushi is often quite expensive and if improperly cut could even cause death, in the case of fugu (blowfish).

Noah Graff watching karaoke with two geishas

Seventy five percent of Mitsui Seiki’s products stay in Japan. But still, the company knew it was important for us “gaijin,” or foreigners, to experience the culture that produces the machines to really understand how Japanese products are unique. The longer I remained in Japan, the more I realized that in Japanese culture, presentation is vital to demonstrate a product’s quality, a company’s quality and a person’s quality. After we visited the company’s plant we were taken to a traditional Japanese hotel called an “onsen,” where we all were required to change into kimonos. We sat on the floor for a traditional Japanese meal of several courses served on individual trays. Numerous small dishes were meticulously arranged on the trays, and contained various raw fish, tempura, pickled vegetables and strips of beef that were cooked in front of us. While we ate, four geishas poured us sake, played instruments, danced and joked with us, putting cheesy, feminine wigs on our heads. We were entertained in a centuries old tradition by women whose lives’ work was, again, devoted to presentation. After the Mitsui Seiki tour ended and I traveled to Kyoto, my fellow hostel dwellers were envious of my geisha experience.

Most of them hadn’t had the opportunity to even see a geisha, let alone be entertained by four of them. There are only a few thousand geishas left in Japan, and their services cost thousands of dollars. But I’m pretty sure that the expense of the geishas wasn’t even debated when Mitsui Seiki planned the trip. It came down to presentation once again. I believe the company hired the geishas because it was the Japanese way. It was the same reason they flew us all business class. They didn’t have to. I would have fl own crumpled in coach in a heartbeat, but business class was the civilized way to travel. It was the proper way to represent the company.

Still, it took me several days after the night with the geishas to identify Japan’s obsession with presentation. It finally hit me when I bought one small cookie at a train station in Tokyo. In 30 seconds, the vendor quickly inserted the cookie into its own individual plastic sleeve, sealed it and then placed the sealed cookie into a larger paper bag. To finish the experience, the vendor presented me the cookie followed by the receipt with two hands carefully balancing the items as though she were presenting me a sacred samurai sword. It was a true Japanese experience. Thirty seconds later it was a real pain to open the packaging, and the excessive paper was terrible for the environment. But this was Japan, and I was starting to get it.

In the Mind of a Japanese Business Man
One of the top journalistic priorities for my trip to Japan was to interview a “quote-un-quote” Japanese businessman. It’s an archetype you see in movies—the small Japanese guys walking around in black suits, riding the busy subway to go to work at large corporations. The trip’s organizers, Lynn Gorman and Scott Walker, warned me that finding someone willing to be interviewed wouldn’t be easy because it might be construed as singling out one person as more important than his peers, which is taboo in Japanese culture. Fortunately, Roy Kawakami, senior general manager of corporate finance and accounting in overseas operations for Mitsui Seiki and close colleague of Scott Walker, casually agreed at dinner the night I arrived to let me interview him. Mr. Kawakami turned out to be a great source for perspective on the differences between Japanese and American business culture. He had received his CPA in the U.S., and he spends two weeks a month in the States working for the company.

Roy explained that one of the fundamental differences in the philosophy of American companies and Japanese companies is that U.S. companies focus on the contributions of individuals, while Japanese companies value the performance of groups or teams. In the U.S. if an employee performs poorly he can be fired, but in the Japanese business model the group manager is held responsible for an employee who is not performing well. This custom is coupled with a traditional Japanese business practice which grants lifetime employment. Thus workers must be motivated in different ways than in the U.S.

Another difference Roy brought up is that unlike most American companies, Japanese companies don’t base their business systems entirely on the goal of meeting monetary targets. He said that in the U.S., companies systematically try to reduce manpower, calling it a “direct approach to results-meaning cutting costs,” while the Japanese emphasize and pay more money for processes. He said he thinks that the philosophies of Japanese businesses are gravitating a little bit towards those of the U.S., but he reiterated that traditional culture is still very important in Japan, which means taking care of customers and giving great service. “Even the McDonalds atmosphere is different,” he said.

It was a great interview—for me at least. But I could sense that Roy wasn’t feeling great about it. He told me afterward that he was little embarrassed about doing the interview. I then felt uncomfortable because I knew Roy was stressed out. I was also undergoing a bit of culture shock. It bothered me a little when Roy didn’t look me in the eye during the interview, likely because eye contact can be seen as aggressive in Japanese culture. I was also bothered by what he had told me about the Japanese view of individualism. It was counter intuitive to the way I approach life. I’m paid to think as an individual, to write about new ideas, to make people think. Suddenly it clicked—I was truly in a new culture, but not surprisingly, I was learning as much about myself as I was about Japan.

The Mitsui Seiki sponsored group at the Onsen Hotel before dinner. Far right: Scott Walker, to his left, Roy Kawakami.

The Mitsui Seiki sponsored group at the Onsen Hotel before dinner. Far right: Scott Walker, to his left, Roy Kawakami.

An interview with Albert Albrecht, a Machining Industry Historian

Interview by Noah Graff

Today’s Machining World Archives April 2009 Volume 5 Issue 04

Albert Albrecht

Albert Albrecht

Albert Albrecht worked in the machine tool industry for 57 years and recently finished a book entitled An American Machine Tool Industry: It’s History, Growth & decline. He began writing in earnest after a walk through IMTS 2008, which confirmed for him the suspicion that 85 percent of modern, successful machine tool builders were foreign.

How did you get into the machine business?
AA
: My dad and uncles were in the industry. If I had gone in another direction I probably would have been put out of the family. In those days not everyone went to high school, you did an apprenticeship with the tool and die makers. You would spend 8,000 hours in an apprenticeship and then you could go out as a certified tool and die maker.

What were the “golden years” in American machine tool building?
AA
: The golden years were from about 1940-1982, when there were 154 American machine tool builders. America started out exporting machine tools because they were better and had better technology than you could get in Europe. People wanted U.S. technology. In 1982 we lost that to Japan, and we’ve never really recovered—at that time we were $5 billion in production and it dropped to $1.9 billion. That was the first recession—it took us 15 years to recover. 2003 was another extremely devastating period with a repeat of 1982’s drop. We’re at $3.3 billion right now, we still haven’t come all the way back.

Who are the companies producing in the U.S. today?
AA
: This is one of our problems—we have an industry that is made up of only six truly international companies—MAG, Hardinge, Gleason, Minster, Haas and Moore. Japan and Germany are number one and two as exporters. 112 of the 145 companies that were alive during the golden years have closed their doors. That’s an estimated loss of $4.3 billion and around 50,000 jobs.

What caused the decline?
AA
: The economic ups and downs of the business. One of the problems in the industry has been the availability of financing from banks. Banks haven’t always been kind to it—they see it as a high-risk business. This led to consolidations and mergers and a reduction in the size of the industry. Also, the conglomerates, which made a lot of acquisitions in the 1940s and 1950s when the companies were attractive, drained them of cash and dumped them off for liquidation. One of the problems we have today is that we talk about creating jobs, but nobody speaks about manufacturing or the loss of the industrial base in this country.

Who were the pioneers of American machine tool building?
AA
: Warner Swasey, Cincinatti—they were the innovators, the real machine tool people. They didn’t think they were doing anything [special], they were just doing a job. But in doing that job they were producing a quality product with innovation ahead of what was already out there, and they built companies on it. When those companies were sold off machine tool people did not take over. They were MBAs and were only looking at the bottom line. They were interested in cash flow and what the companies could produce, not in the long-term. The original owners were dedicated to the business, had long-term objectives and loved the product they produced. I was one of those people. I was part of that generation.

What’s your goal in writing this book?
AA
: Having been a person who was part of the industry—and there are not too many of us left—I think the story of the industry’s growth and its importance to the country needs to be told. More important than anything else is establishing a business environment today that will encourage manufacturing and the recovery of our industrial base. Not just in high-tech industries, but the base of manufacturing. The machine tool industry is no longer a dirty, grubby industry—it’s clean floors, high-tech and computers. Yet we tell our young people, “Manufacturing, no. You want to be a doctor or lawyer.” I want this book to change the mindset of our country in regards to the importance of manufacturing. Yes, we can buy and consume goods, but one of the things we don’t realize is that if we buy [foreign] machine tools, even if those tools are produced in this country, the profits and earnings go back to Japan.

A Mother’s/Father’s Day Story

By Lloyd Graff

Greek Easter Bread (Lambropsomo) - MyRecipes.com

I’ve always looked at the Hallmark holidays of Mother’s Day and Father’s Day with apprehension. It comes from my Dad’s anxious attitude toward his mother, who used the occasion to employ emotional extortion to exact the tribute she expected from our family.

My father lived in fear of her neurotic twists and occasional psychotic breaks. For my own mother, Mother’s Day was her day to nurture my Dad as he tiptoed through the rituals of motherly appeasement.

As a child I observed my parents’ management of Grandma Graff with a combination of amusement and studiousness. It was a lesson in the art of maintaining family peace without admitting the weirdness of our group dance.

I grew up with the dark presence of Ethel Graff at our house every Friday night and Sunday where she would routinely attempt to sow jealously and discontent. She dripped contempt for my mother, who unflappably played three cornered emotional poker with her and my father. One of my grandmother’s more transparent gambits was to ask me and my siblings, “Who do you like more, your mother or your father?”

We would play along, saying we liked them just the same, but in retrospect I wish I would have said, “I’m never going to give you a straight answer to such a ridiculously transparent and stupid question.” But that kind of honesty was forbidden toward dangerous Grandma Graff.

My father occasionally referred to a past Mother’s Day nightmare. His mother was offended one year because she felt her sister-in-law, Ida Pinkert, received better treatment on Mother’s Day than she had (which was quite possible because Ida was clearly a more beloved mother). My grandmother went into a long vituperative tantrum, which eventually led to her hospitalization in a psychiatric ward.

My dad was traumatized by this Mother’s Day spectacular. The holiday became a black mark on his calendar—a day to be navigated around, not embraced.

As a kid I got the scary message without having it explicitly stated. For me Mother’s Day and its cloned cousin Father’s Day, were like Greek Easter to me—holidays other people celebrated.

Question: What comes to mind when you think of Mother’s Day and Father’s Day?

Lunatic Express

Today’s Machining World interviewed Carl Hoffman, author of The Lunatic Express, a book which chronicles his travels throughout Asia, Africa, South America and the U.S., where he attempted to travel by modes of transportation commonly used by the natives, notorious for discomfort, tardiness and poor safety.

How did you get the idea for the book?
Carl Hoffman: I’d been traveling a lot for work over the last decade in places like the Congo, Sudan and South America. I saw minivans and trains just packed with people, and people riding on the roofs of trains. My journalist sensibility was asking me, “who are these people, where are they going and why are they moving around?”

How did these people look at you, as they were traveling out of necessity for work and you were this American traveling alone to document an adventure?
CH: They looked at me with incredible curiosity and openness. Most of these people don’t travel alone. They travel with family members. Most people spend very little time in their whole lives alone. They sleep in big piles in a one-room apartment or a shack somewhere, and then they have this incredibly long commute in a crowded minivan or matatu or train, and they have a job that’s full of people. They kept asking me, “Are you alone? Why are you alone? Where’s your family? Why are you here? Why aren’t you traveling in first class, or why aren’t you flying?”

Did you see much manufacturing going on during your travels?
CH:
Well, one really cool thing throughout the Third World is the amount of small scale manufacturing and small scale human enterprise. In Bangladesh, you can walk down the street and there’s nothing but bicycle rickshaw shops, and guys are welding and banging and doing it in bare feet without shirts. It’s hot, and they’re building things. I had a bicycle messenger bag and its zipper was broken. One day I was just sitting around having tea in the park with some shoe shiners and an ear cleaner that had I buddied up with. One of them suddenly pointed at my zipper and he grabbed my bag and went at it with a little wax from his kit and a razor blade. And with incredible care, he fixed my zipper. It’s the sort of thing that only a poor Indian in a park would do. We don’t fix a zipper. We take it in and send it away, and maybe they send back a new one or they rip the whole zipper out and sew a new one in. This guy fixed it. They have a whole mentality and culture of fixing things and building things, and it’s kind of been lost here.

Read the full interview

Interview with Jim and Mary Rickert, of the Prather Ranch in Northern California

Interview by Noah Graff

Today’s Machining World Archive September 2008 Volume 4 Issue 09

Jim and Mary Rickert, of the Prather Ranch in Northern California

For the past 18 years, Jim & Mary Rickert, managers of the Prather Ranch in Northern California, have sold animal tissue from their organically raised, closed her, to biotech companies for use in medical procedures and to produce medical components such as bone screws. They also run a world renown organic beef business.

Noah Graff: What is a closed herd, and how did you get into selling animal tissue?
Mary Rickert: We’d been managing [the Prather Ranch] for a little over 10 years, but we had begun making it smaller because it just wasn’t making money. More by accident than anything else, we just hadn’t added any animals to it. In 1990, we were approached by a friend of ours, a plastic surgeon who had developed a patent using collagen from bovine hides. He was looking for a herd of cattle that was in an area somewhat isolated and pristine and not surrounded by other cattle; we met all the criteria of what he was looking for. We attributed a lot of his thought process to a gentleman by the name of Claude Miller, who realized that the Mad Cow Disease going on in the United Kingdom could very easily come over here, which it eventually did.

NG: When did you start selling the bones?
MR: Well, we also sold blood for awhile and we had another company that worked with arteries for a long time. As far as bones, it was originally for the Florida tissue bank associated with the University of Florida. We shipped them just a few bones and they stuck them in baboons and everything seemed to work really well. It’s been in the last couple years [they’ve been used with humans].

NG: What is your opinion of the conventional meat you buy at the store?
Jim Rickert: I think that it’s a mass produced, commoditized product. Something like 90 percent of the beef slaughtering in the United States is done by about three companies and there’s some Brazilians who are trying to buy all three of them. A normal commercial slaughter plant does between 1,000 to 4,000 head per day. But, I think [the U.S.] has relatively good quality. I think USDA does a pretty darn good job given how big the situation is, and we’ve done a lot of work with the breeding herds as contrasts to other parts of the world. Yet [Prather] does very low volume. We slaughter one day a week. I think our smallest slaughter was 18 beef and our biggest was 25.

NG: Define organic for me.
JR: It basically means that you don’t use synthetic animal production items and the land that the animals graze or the feed the animals receive is raised in an organic manner. That means basically [that there are] no synthetic fertilizers, no growth hormones, no antibiotics fed in the feed, no little things like feeding them cow manure and chicken manure.

NG: Does your meat taste different?
JR: Yes, we do a few other things on the meat side of it that are kind of unusual, but they’re very traditional in my family. A real important part for meat quality is handling [the animal] very gently and making sure it’s not stressed out. When animals are stressed, there are a lot of stress hormones that come out and they don’t make good meat. We also do dry aging. We hang the beef for at least two weeks in a cooler at about 36 to 38 degrees before we cut it up. What happens is about three percent of the moisture evaporates from it and it concentrates the flavor. Also the muscles start to relax and basically it becomes more tender.

NG: What are you most excited about for the future of agriculture, beef?
JR: Well, it’s interesting. In a little business like ours it’s kind of returned to what it was like in the United States let’s say about 1900. There were a lot of little slaughter plants and little localized businesses that provided products and hired local people. At least there’s a few of them now out there doing that, and I wonder if this might be the future that we don’t have the mega facilities. In these rural areas, we’ve had a hard time keeping young people in our communities They’re just dying from that standpoint. Our schools are getting smaller and smaller, and wouldn’t it be exciting if young people could come back and produce jobs in our area, and they could raise families here and we could not just have a greying community out here..

For the past 18 years, Jim & Mary Rickert, managers of the Prather Ranch in Northern California, have sold animal tissue from their organically raised, closed her, to biotech companies for use in medical procedures and to produce medical components such as bone screws. They also run a world renown organic beef business.

Noah Graff: What is a closed herd, and how did you get into selling animal tissue?

Mary Rickert: We’d been managing [the Prather Ranch] for a little over 10 years, but we had begun making it smaller because it just wasn’t making money. More by accident than anything else, we just hadn’t added any animals to it. In 1990, we were approached by a friend of ours, a plastic surgeon who had developed a patent using collagen from bovine hides. He was looking for a herd of cattle that was in an area somewhat isolated and pristine and not surrounded by other cattle; we met all the criteria of what he was looking for. We attributed a lot of his thought process to a gentleman by the name of Claude Miller, who realized that the Mad Cow Disease going on in the United Kingdom could very easily come over here, which it eventually did.

NG: When did you start selling the bones?

MR: Well, we also sold blood for awhile and we had another company that worked with arteries for a long time. As far as bones, it was originally for the Florida tissue bank associated with the University of Florida. We shipped them just a few bones and they stuck them in baboons and everything seemed to work really well. It’s been in the last couple years [they’ve been used with humans].

NG: What is your opinion of the conventional meat you buy at the store?

Jim Rickert: I think that it’s a mass produced, commoditized product. Something like 90 percent of the beef slaughtering in the United States is done by about three companies and there’s some Brazilians who are trying to buy all three of them. A normal commercial slaughter plant does between 1,000 to 4,000 head per day. But, I think [the U.S.] has relatively good quality. I think USDA does a pretty darn good job given how big the situation is, and we’ve done a lot of work with the breeding herds as contrasts to other parts of the world. Yet [Prather] does very low volume. We slaughter one day a week. I think our smallest slaughter was 18 beef and our biggest was 25.

NG: Define organic for me.

JR: It basically means that you don’t use synthetic animal production items and the land that the animals graze or the feed the animals receive is raised in an organic manner. That means basically [that there are] no synthetic fertilizers, no growth hormones, no antibiotics fed in the feed, no little things like feeding them cow manure and chicken manure.

NG: Does your meat taste different?

JR: Yes, we do a few other things on the meat side of it that are kind of unusual, but they’re very traditional in my family. A real important part for meat quality is handling [the animal] very gently and making sure it’s not stressed out. When animals are stressed, there are a lot of stress hormones that come out and they don’t make good meat. We also do dry aging. We hang the beef for at least two weeks in a cooler at about 36 to 38 degrees before we cut it up. What happens is about three percent of the moisture evaporates from it and it concentrates the flavor. Also the muscles start to relax and basically it becomes more tender.

NG: What are you most excited about for the future of agriculture, beef?

JR: Well, it’s interesting. In a little business like ours it’s kind of returned to what it was like in the United States let’s say about 1900. There were a lot of little slaughter plants and little localized businesses that provided products and hired local people. At least there’s a few of them now out there doing that, and I wonder if this might be the future that we don’t have the mega facilities. In these rural areas, we’ve had a hard time keeping young people in our communities They’re just dying from that standpoint. Our schools are getting smaller and smaller, and wouldn’t it be exciting if young people could come back and produce jobs in our area, and they could raise families here and we could not just have a greying community out here..

So Bored with Boards

By Lloyd Graff

Why should somebody work as a volunteer in an organization? My wife Risa and I discussed this topic last night as she was considering her last President’s message to the membership of the Association of Educational Therapists, a national professional organization she heads.

Risa has put her heart and soul into volunteering for this organization. She wants other people to follow in her footsteps. My basic orientation on other hand, has always been, “why should I spend my good time on some dumb organization?”

I have no tolerance for group meetings. They put me to sleep. I’ve never been part of an organization that interested me enough to get me to endure the endless prattle of group discussion. I know this sounds hopelessly arrogant, but I’ll admit to being a lousy member. And if you are a lousy member of a group, you will certainly be a terrible leader.

For me, one of the ugliest words in the English language is “committee.” To serve on a committee is to be sentenced to boredom. I may have a little ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder), which educational therapists address in their work, because when somebody inquires if I’ll work on a committee for a charity or professional group, I run for the closest foxhole. To me a board meeting is a bored meeting.

Yet I realize that organizations like the Association of Educational Therapists, the Precision Machined Products Association (PMPA) and the National Tooling and Machining Association (NTMA) do good work and rely on the members input. That means groups, subgroups, and committees. As a member of these organizations I freeload on their efforts. I pay my dues and tune out when members laud other members for the many hours they put in.

I believe the world is divided between the people who like meetings and process and chitchat and sociableness, and the aliens who prefer to be alone or go one-on-one.

If I have the choice of a meeting or Siena vs. Towson State in basketball on ESPN, I’ll choose the engagement with the TV.

Question: If you do boards and committees, what do you get out of it?

Photo from Aransa

An Expensive and Messy Road

By Noah Graff

The BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is a tragic fiasco. Everyone can agree on that, but now that it’s happened, the U.S. government is confronted with the decision of how to go forward.

It has imposed a six-month moratorium on drilling in more than 500 feet of water in the Gulf. President Obama has also put on hold plans to expand drilling off the coast of Alaska.

This decision is based on the claim by environmental groups that we still don’t have a good understanding of why the disaster occurred and what other safety negligence is occurring in other similar wells.

On the other hand, halting offshore drilling salts the wounds of the people in the Gulf region, whose lives are already a mess from the destruction from the spill and recent natural disasters. Many of the people living around the Gulf have jobs in the off-shore drilling industry. The region’s tourism has been crushed, houses destroyed, the livelihood of fishermen stripped, and now drilling for oil, one of the few resources still sustaining the people of the region is being taken away too. Many people are more angry at the government than they are at BP.

One of BP’s main competitors in the gulf, Chevron, has distanced itself from BP and says that a six-month moratorium on drilling is an overreaction because it has much better safeguards for its wells. While this may be true, Chevron recently was involved in an onshore drilling accident involving a Chevron pipeline in Utah that leaked what officials estimated was hundreds of barrels of crude oil into a Salt Lake City creek and threatened to contaminate the Great Salt Lake.

The moral of all this—drilling for oil is a dangerous, dirty game that the government should have been monitoring much more closely. To fix the disaster and attempt to prevent it from happening again will be expensive and messy—kind of like mending the economic debacle of 2009.

Source: Wall Street Journal

Photo from Seattle Times

Mid-Continent Engineering Lands Contract with GE Healthcare

MINNEAPOLIS, June 10, 2010 – Mid-Continent Engineering has been selected to manufacture and assemble a critical assembly for GE Healthcare’s industry-leading ultrasound business.

Mid-Continent Engineering, a Minneapolis-based precision contract manufacturer, adds the latest contract to an ongoing portfolio of work for GE Healthcare.

“We’re proud to build upon our existing partnership with GE Healthcare,” said Sanders Marvin, president and CEO of Mid-Continent. “Our record of quality, innovation and on-time performance has helped us grow a lasting relationship with GE Healthcare, the world leader in innovative healthcare technology.”

The contract is valued at more than $1 million. For competitive reasons, further details on the critical ultrasound assembly cannot be disclosed.

GE Healthcare is a $17 billion unit of General Electric Co. whose transformational medical technologies and services are shaping a new age of patient care.

“As a premier U.S. contract manufacturer, we’re especially pleased to win the contract for this assembly, which was previously being sourced from Europe,” Marvin said. “It’s proof that U.S. manufacturers can compete worldwide – if they’re prepared to deliver world-class performance.”

From the World Coal Institute

From the World Coal Institute



South Africa
is the country most dependent on coal world wide, generating 94% of its electricity (in 2007)

Coal provides 26% of global primary energy needs and generates 41.5% of the world’s electricity

21st Century coal plants emit 40% less CO2 than the average 20th century coal plants

Coal will last us at least 122 more years

The use of coal will rise 60% over the next 20 years

Climate change action will coast an extra $128 trillion annually without CCS (Carbon Capture & Storage)